How did we overcome the IPv4 address shortage?

How did we overcome the IPv4 address shortage?

The internet has transformed nearly every aspect of our lives. Behind this massive network lies a seemingly technical and often overlooked facet: the assigned IP addresses that make everything work. These unique identifiers are paramount for devices to communicate over the internet.

However, as the digital revolution surged forward, a challenge emerged – the IPv4 address exhaustion. Essentially, we began to run out of IPv4 addresses. So, how did we overcome the IPv4 address shortage?

Understanding the Crisis

IPv4, or Internet Protocol version 4, was the primary method by which devices on the internet were assigned their addresses for several decades. With its 32-bit address format, it can support 2^32 addresses, which translates to around 4.3 billion addresses. In the 1970s and 80s, this number seemed more than sufficient. As the internet grew and more devices connected, there was pressure on the address space.

The first signs of the impending shortage were evident as early as the 1990s. Technologists began to realize that sooner or later, we would run out of IPv4 addresses. The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA), which oversees the global allocation of IP addresses, was at the center of these concerns.

Evolution from Only an IP Address to Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR)

In the early days of the Internet, organizations allocated addresses in large blocks based on classes. Even if an organization didn’t need many addresses, they still got a big block of them. This was a significant factor in the speedy exhaustion of IPv4 addresses.

In the 1990s, the concept of Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR) was introduced in response. Instead of allocating addresses based on broad classes, CIDR allowed for variable-length subnet masking. This was a leap from only an IP address to classless inter-domain routing. CIDR improved IP address allocation, ensuring organizations received the exact number of addresses they needed.

Introducing Network Address Translation (NAT)

Another ingenious solution to the IPv4 address exhaustion was the implementation of Network Address Translation (NAT). Simply put, NAT lets many devices on a private network use one public IP address.

Many homes have multiple devices that connect to the internet using a single IP address provided by the service provider. These devices include phones, laptops, and gaming consoles. NAT in the router changes private IP addresses to its own public address when sending packets to the internet. This massively reduced the need for unique public IP addresses for every device.

Transitioning to IPv6

Though CIDR and NAT alleviated the pressure temporarily, they weren’t permanent solutions. The tech community understood that a more sustainable solution was necessary. Enter IPv6 (Internet Protocol version 6). With a staggering 128-bit address format, it can support around 340 undecillion addresses – that’s a number with 36 zeros!

IPv6 not only resolved the address shortage problem but also introduced several enhancements in areas like security and routing. The transition from IPv4 to IPv6 is ongoing. While IPv4 is still in use, IPv6 adoption rates are increasing steadily, especially as more devices come online and the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority encourages the transition.


So, how did we overcome the IPv4 address shortage? Through a combination of immediate tactics like CIDR and NAT and long-term strategies like the transition to IPv6. The problem was not solved with just one answer. It required a combination of new ideas, adjustments, and forward-looking approaches.

The tech community showed resilience and adaptability when dealing with a potential crisis in IP addresses and finding sustainable solutions. The digital world is constantly evolving, which means that the systems supporting it will also change. This is necessary to ensure that the Internet remains useful and accessible to everyone.

Scroll to Top